St. Gregory of Nyssa on the
Filioque
According to St. Gregory of Nyssa,
"It is
as if a man were to see a separate flame burning on three torches (and we will
suppose that the third flame is caused by that of the first being transmitted
to the middle, and then kindling the end torch ), and were to maintain that the
heat in the first exceeded that of the others; that next it showed a variation
from it in the direction of the less; and that the third could not be called
fire at all, though it burnt and shone just like fire, and did everything that
fire does. But if there is really no hindrance to the third torch being fire,
though it has been kindled from a previous flame, what is the philosophy of
these men, who profanely think that they can slight the dignity of the Holy
Spirit because He is named by the Divine lips after the Father and the
Son?"
(On the Holy
Spirit, Against the Macedonians)
Elsewhere he writes,
"one is
the Cause, and another is of the Cause; and again in that which is of the Cause
we recognize another distinction. For one is directly from the first Cause, and
another by that which is directly from the first Cause; so that the attribute
of being Only-begotten abides without doubt in the Son, and the interposition
of the Son, while it guards His attribute of being Only-begotten, does not shut
out the Spirit from His relation by way of nature to the Father."
(On "Not
Three Gods")
St. Gregory is talking about the Spirit's eternal origin. If the Holy Spirit received His substance from the Son (not merely that He shares the same substance with the Son), then the Son enjoys some manner of eternal causality, which is exactly what the Latin doctrine holds.
St. Gregory is talking about the Spirit's eternal origin. If the Holy Spirit received His substance from the Son (not merely that He shares the same substance with the Son), then the Son enjoys some manner of eternal causality, which is exactly what the Latin doctrine holds.
No comments:
Post a Comment