Tuesday, January 28, 2020

Priesthood in the Didache

 
Scholars assign various dates to the Didache. Some have suggested that the document itself is composed of material all within the first century, while others have assigned it to the early second century. Even with the later dating, it still constitutes early testimony of Christian belief and practice. One interesting tidbit is the Didache’s reference to the priesthood. In 1 Corinthians 12:28, St. Paul writes, “And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers…” The Didache remarks, 

pasan oun aparchn gennhmatwn lhnou kai alwnov, bown te kai probatwn labwn dwseiv thn aparchn toiv profhtaiv, autoi gar eisin oi arciereiv umwn.

Every first-fruit, therefore, of the products of wine-press and threshing-floor, of oxen and of sheep, you shall take and give to the prophets, for they are your high priests.[1]
 
The prophets (which is to say those who have the authority to speak for God) are called Christian’s ἀρχιερεύς or ‘arch-hiereus’ (i.e., arch-priests).



[1] Didache 13:3

The Sacrifice of the Mass according to the Martyrdom of Polycarp


 
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Eucharist and Mission: A Preliminary Consideration, trans. by Vincent Twomey, S.V.D., Irish Theological Quarterly 65 (2000), 257-259.

III. Martyrdom, Christian Life, and Apostolic Ministry as the Actual Fulfilment of the Eucharist



After considering in broad outline the specific sacramental level of eucharistic theology in the New Testament, specifically in the First Letter to the Corinthians, we must look, however briefly, at the third level. This level I should like to call the ’existential’ level, so as to draw some conclusions for the theme of Eucharist and mission. Here I will discuss three texts: Phil 2:17 (to which 2 Tim 4:6 once again briefly alludes); in addition : Rom 12:1 and 15:16


1. Martyrdom as the Christian becoming Eucharist ’


In the Letter to the Philippians, Paul, in prison and awaiting trial, speaks about the possibility of martyrdom, and he does so, astonishingly, in liturgical language: ’Even if I am to be poured as a libation on the sacrificial offering of your faith.’ The Apostle’s martyrdom is of a liturgical character, it is a pouring out of life as a sacrifice, allowing oneself to be poured out for humanity, What happens here is a becoming one with the self-gift of Jesus Christ, with his great act of love, which itself is the true adoration of God. The martyrdom of the apostle participates in the mystery of the Christ’s Cross and in its theological dignity. It becomes lived liturgy, which is recognised as such in faith and is itself a service for the faith. Because it is true liturgy, it also brings about what all liturgy aims at: joy, that joy which can only arise from the encounter between man and God, from the abolition of the limits of earthly existence.


What Paul hints at here in one single, short sentence, is fully developed in the account of the martyrdom of Saint Polycarp. The entire martyrdom is depicted as liturgy, indeed, as the becoming Eucharist of the martyr, who enters into full communion with the Pasch of Jesus Christ and thus becomes Eucharist with him. To begin with, it is recounted how the great bishop is chained and his hands bound to his back. Thus he appears ’like a noble ram (lamb!), who is led to God from the great herd, a sacrifice pleasing to God and prepared for him.’ The martyr, who in the meantime has been placed on the pyre and tied up there, now utters a kind of Eucharistic Prayer: he gives thanks for the knowledge of God, which has been granted to him though his beloved Son, Jesus Christ. He praises God, because he has been found worthy to receive a share in the chalice of Jesus with a view to the resurrection. Finally, he prays with words taken from the Book of Daniel, which in all probability had at an earlier stage been taken up into the Christian liturgy: ’to be accepted before you today as a pleasing and rich offering ...’ The text ends in a great doxology, as liturgical Eucharistic Prayers do. After Polycarp had spoken the Amen, the slaves light the pyre, and now a threefold miracle is reported, in which once again the liturgical character of the occurrence is portrayed in its diverse significance. The fire first of all takes on the form of a sail enclosing the saint on all sides. The burning pyre appears like a ship with billowing sails that transports the martyr across the boundaries of the earth into the hands of God. However, his burnt body, it is said, appears not like burnt flesh but rather like baked bread. And finally, there is no smell of burnt flesh; what those present inhale is a sweet scent ’like that of incense or precious aromas’. The pleasant odour is, in the Old as in the New Testament, a constitutive ingredient of the theology of sacrifice. In Paul, it is an expression of a life become pure, no longer exuding the stench of the lie and corruption, the decaying smell of death, but rather the refreshing air of life and love, the atmosphere suited to God and healing to man. Thus the image of the pleasant aroma and that of becoming bread belong together: the martyr has become like Christ; his life has become an offering. Not from him the poison of the decomposition of the living caused by the power of death; from him radiates the power of life, he nurtures life, as good bread lets us live. Surrender into the body of Christ has triumphed over the power of death: the martyr lives and gives life, precisely through his death, and so he himself has entered into the eucharistic mystery. Martyrdom is a source of faith.





The Propitiatory Sacrifice of the Mass according to Ignatius of Antioch



In his second letter to Timothy, St. Paul writes, “For I am already on the point of being sacrificed; the time of my departure has come” (2 Timothy 4:6; cf. Philippians 2:7). Generally, the term used for sacrifice in Greek is “thusia;” however, St. Paul uses the first person singular passive verb “spendomai,” which translated means “to pour out,” as in a libation or drink-offering. This expression is an allusion to the Jewish ritual of pouring wine into the altar after the sacrificial animal had been burnt (cf. Numbers 28:7). St. Paul employs this metaphor to cast his own martyrdom in a liturgical light. Thus, his death becomes a public act of worship, whereby he offers himself both bodily and spiritually to God, much in the same way that Christ offered himself on the cross.

The Eucharistic overtones of the Greek verb are more clearly seen in the writings of St. Ignatius of Antioch, who in his letter to the Romans, writes, “Do not seek to confer any greater favor upon me than that I be sacrificed to God while the altar is still prepared.”[1] Here, St. Ignatius picks up on the apostle’s metaphor, even employing the same Greek verb (spendomai). However, he expands on the sacrificial metaphor by referring to himself as the bread and wheat of Christ in the same letter. He writes,

Allow me to become food for the wild beasts, through whose instrumentality it will be granted me to attain to God. I am the wheat of God, and let me be ground by the teeth of the wild beasts, that I may be found the pure bread of Christ. Rather entice the wild beasts, that they may become my tomb, and may leave nothing of my body; so that when I have fallen asleep, I may be no trouble to any one. Then shall I truly be a disciple of Christ, when the world shall not see so much as my body.[2] (emphasis mine)

            The Letter to the Romans contains three essential elements of the Mass: an altar, an allusion to wine, and two explicit references to the Eucharist. St. Ignatius not only identifies himself with the Eucharist, but also parallels his martyrdom which the Eucharistic sacrifice, which is offered upon the altar of God.

            We also find Eucharistic allusions in three of Ignatius’ other letters.[3] Here, I will only cite his letters to the Philadelphians and Smyrnaeans. In his Letter to the Philadelphians, St. Ignatius compares the bread and wine to the flesh and blood of Christ which he says are offered upon the altar. He writes,

Take heed, then, to have but one Eucharist. For there is one flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ, and one cup to [show forth ] the unity of His blood; one altar; as there is one bishop, along with the presbytery and deacons, my fellow-servants: that so, whatsoever you do, you may do it according to [the will of] God.[4]
….
I flee to the Gospel as to the flesh of Jesus, and to the apostles as to the presbytery of the Church.[5]

However, the most explicit statement in support of Eucharistic realism is found in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans. Ignatius writes,

They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again.[6]

St. Ignatius says that the Eucharist is the self-same flesh of Christ which suffered and which the Father, of his goodness, raised up again. The article in Greek is neuter, so it's not merely that Jesus was raised, but that his flesh was raised. The flesh *which* suffered, and the flesh *which* was raised for our salvation. In essence, by emphasizing the literalism of the bodily resurrection, he is also emphasizing a particular view of the Eucharist, namely, the Real Presence (as opposed to a purely symbolic or pneumatological understanding of the Eucharist). The Real Presence of the Eucharist is also reaffirmed by the sufferings of the martyrs. St. Ignatius writes in the same letter,

But if these things were done by our Lord only in appearance, then am I also only in appearance bound? And why have I also surrendered myself to death, to fire, to the sword, to the wild beasts? But he who is near to the sword is near to God; he that is among the wild beasts is in company with God; provided only he be so in the name of Jesus Christ. I undergo all these things that I may suffer together with Him, He who became a perfect man inwardly strengthening me.[7]

            Here, Ignatius is writing in opposition to the Docetists (a Gnostic sect). The Docetists rejected the bodily sufferings of Christ because they denied he possessed a physical body. However, Ignatius argues that the physical sufferings of the martyrs would be rendered meaningless if Christ did not suffer bodily also. He incorporates the Eucharist into his argument in chapter 7 by suggesting that their refusal to participate in the Eucharist reflects their disbelief in the bodily sufferings and resurrection of Christ. By connecting the Eucharist to the bodily sufferings of Christ, Ignatius is not only emphasizing Eucharistic realism, but also the sacrificial nature of the Mass itself. The martyrs, through their sufferings and death, are not only united to Christ on the cross, but also the Eucharistic sacrifice itself, as Ignatius implies in his letter to the Romans. As Catholic theologian, Servais Pinckaers, writes

Just as Christ truly suffered in his body, so Ignatius suffers in his own body to the point of shedding blood, and it is also the body and blood of Jesus that Christians receive in the Eucharist, as fortifying nourishment. It is for this reason that the Docetists, denying the reality of the Passion, did not participate in the celebration of the Eucharist and rendered the sufferings of the martyrs pointless.[8]




[1] Ignatius, Letter to the Romans, 2.
[2] Ibid., chapter 4.
[3] Letter to the Ephesians 5 & 20; Letter to the Philadelphians 4 & 5; Letter to the Smyrnaeans 7.
[4] Letter to the Philadelphians 4
[5] Ibid., chapter 5.
[6] Letter to the Smyrnaeans 7
[7] Letter to the Smyrnaeans 4
[8] Servais Pinckaers, “The Spirituality of Martyrdom ... to the Limits of Love,” trans. Patrick M. Clark and Annie Hounsokou (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2016).

Jesus is the Glory of Yahweh

The implicit identification of Jesus as the Tabernacle in 1:14a is often overlooked. The Greek term ἐσκήνωσεν (eskēnōsen, tabernacled) is unique to Johannine literature (not found anywhere else in the New Testament). The Greek term elicits Old Testament imagery of Yahweh’s manifestation in the tabernacle. According to the Zondervan Bible Dictionary, “The related [Hebrew] verb sakan ("to dwell") is used of God's being "tabernacled" with his people (Exod. 25:8; 29:45; et al.). This usage is found in a number of ancient Semitic writings and means "to encamp." The sense is that of God revealing himself on earth in the midst of his chosen people.”[1]

The gospel author not only depicts Jesus as the New Tabernacle, but also as Yahweh who manifests His glory in the midst of the people. This interpretation is reinforced by 14b-c (“we behold his glory, glory as the only unique son from the Father”). Just as Yahweh revealed himself to the Israelites in the Tent of Meeting, so too does Jesus reveal his divine glory by the signs he performs, “This was the beginning of the signs that Jesus performed at Cana in Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him” (John 2:11). There is even an implicit allusion to Jesus’ identity as the Tabernacle/Temple in the Cana narrative, when we place it in relation to its corresponding sign, viz.-  the flux of water and blood from Jesus’ side (Jn 19:34). This passage has both nuptial symbolism and Temple allusions. The Temple allusions are only noticeable in light of the design and landscape of the Jerusalem temple itself. According to Mishnah Middoth,At the south-western corner [of the altar] there were two holes like two narrow nostrils by which the blood that was poured over the western based and the southern base used to run down and mingle in the water-channel and flow out into the brook Kidron."[2]
           
Jesus’ identity as the Tabernacle is also alluded to in the anointing scene of John 12. After Mary anoints Jesus’ feet, the author adds an interesting detail, “and the house was filled (eplērōthē, ἐπληρώθη) with the fragrance of the ointment” (Jn 12:3). This passage is reminiscent of Old Testament descriptions of God’s glory “filling” the Tabernacle / Temple (cf. Exod 40:34-35; 2 Chron 5:13-14; 7:1-2; 1 Kings 8:10-11). Now let us take note of the transition from the consecration of Jesus to the consecration of his disciples (13:1-8). We should interpret Jesus’ act of foot washing in John 13 in light of his identity as the Tabernacle in John 12:3. In other words, we should see the foot washing as a kind of ordination ceremony (13:14-15), in which the disciples are consecrated as priests in service of the New Tabernacle. This follows the structure of the Mosaic consecration account of the tabernacle and priests.

So I will consecrate the tabernacle of meeting and the altar. I will also consecrate both Aaron and his sons to minister to Me as priests. I will dwell among the children of Israel and will be their God (Exodus 29:44-45).

           
Interestingly, after consecrating his disciples as priests we find the theme of indwelling in John 14:15-17 and 23.


If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you, and will be in you.
….
Jesus answered him, “If a man loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.


[1] J. D. Douglas & Merrill C. Tenney, “Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary,” (Zondervan Academic, 2011), 1416.
[2] Mishnah Middoth [Measurements] 3:2. See also Mishnah Yoma [Day of Atonement] 5:6; Zebahim [Sacrifices] 8:7; Temurah [Exchange] 7:6; Tamid [Always] 5:5; Mishnah Meliah [Sacrilege] 3:3.